CFUW 133 - Rika
Nov. 6th, 2011 02:48 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Okay, I'm not sure this is the kind of reasoning I should post where the wolves can see it, so I'll do it here.
If it's not obvious enough by now, I don't think you're the wolf.
If it's not obvious enough by now, I don't think you're the wolf.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 12:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 01:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 01:15 am (UTC)...Hey Lambda, I just noticed something. Look at the first day's vote, highlighted with the assumptions that you and Hazama are sheep and Kiyama's a wolf.
Desmond, 5 votes: Kokonoe, Accelerator, Toshiko, Kiyama, Klavier
Lambdadelta, 2 votes: Mayumi, Ankh
Kiyama, 4 votes: Rika, Parker, Lambdadelta, Hazama
no vote: Desmond
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 01:37 am (UTC)If Accelerator really is a wolf, though, I wonder why all three would put their vote on the same sheep. It's true that looking at the final stats it wouldn't have been possible for them to keep Kiyama from going up no matter what, but... This would be easier to figure out if there were a record of what order the overall votes came in, but I'm not seeing one in the ousting post--most people didn't make note of it.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 01:55 am (UTC)[shrugs] The obvious possible answer is that they figured piling up on someone who wasn't there was the best way to distract from Kiyama. And I doubt they'd want to risk him going up against you, since I doubt he'd've survived against anyone who could offer a decent defense. I wouldn't consider it firm evidence, but I'd definitely question Accelerator pretty hard on that tomorrow.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:35 am (UTC)... Looks like our most useful player is back.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:40 am (UTC)I'll go work on Accelerator some more. Getting Hazama not to screw things up if he feels like it will be tricky.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 03:01 am (UTC)On this kind of thing? I certainly do.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 03:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 03:05 am (UTC)Even by my definition?
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 03:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 03:12 am (UTC)