CFUW 133 - Rika
Nov. 6th, 2011 02:48 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Okay, I'm not sure this is the kind of reasoning I should post where the wolves can see it, so I'll do it here.
If it's not obvious enough by now, I don't think you're the wolf.
If it's not obvious enough by now, I don't think you're the wolf.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 07:02 pm (UTC)Of the third clue, who do you think the wolf is?
no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 08:48 pm (UTC)Accelerator:
Suspicion: Desmond (second)
Ousting: Desmond (second)
Suspicion: Kokonoe (first)
Ousting: Mayumi (first)
Suspicion: Kokonoe (first)
Ousting: Kokonoe (first)
Ankh:
Suspicion: Me (second)
Ousting: Desmond (seventh)
Suspicion: Mayumi (second? votes were all screwed up due to switching)
Ousting: Mayumi (fourth)
Suspicion: Rika (fourth)
Ousting: Kokonoe (fifth)
The two sort of look like they're on opposite ends of the scale to me: Accelerator seems overconfident in all of his votes whereas Ankh seems overly bandwagon-y in all of them. Accelerator is almost always one of the first to throw in a vote, whereas Ankh is often the last or close to last. I can't say for sure which I think is necessarily more suspicious until I hear out their rationale. I've seen what Accelerator's had to say concerning you during the oustings, but other than that I've barely talked to either of them at all. As it is, I'd lean towards Ankh, but again I haven't talked to him and have no idea what he's thinking, whereas with Accelerator I at least have some idea of where he's coming from. I think the voting tonight might help push me in one direction or another on the off-chance I don't get voted out and we lose this.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 09:13 pm (UTC)...Hey Lambda, you've seen more people than me. How stupid can a person be?
no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 09:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 09:18 pm (UTC)You're trying to say he's just that stupid.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 09:23 pm (UTC)...But. No one's that stupid.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 10:06 pm (UTC)Hey Lambda, what's your thoughts on Kiyama telling me that he thinks Ankh is the wolf from the third clue?
no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 10:35 pm (UTC)[shrug] Trying to get decent arguments out of him is annoying. I should mention I told Accelerator before getting that that I thought you were innocent and Kiyama was a wolf, so I think there might be a crack in Accelerator versus Ankh if I can figure it out.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 10:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 11:41 pm (UTC)[reluctant pause] I don't know how much of this you know, but you need to for game purposes. [very factual, covering any emotional response with that] Assuming I'm right, and we make it through the night, one of us will be the safe sheep taken anyway. If it's me, you should know that last time we were in one of Hatter's games, Accelerator made a deal with Hatter that he could kill someone else in my place, and proceeded to use the fact that I had been taken out by a wolf, and the fact that he would never kill a little girl, as evidence that he could not be a wolf.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 12:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 01:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 01:15 am (UTC)...Hey Lambda, I just noticed something. Look at the first day's vote, highlighted with the assumptions that you and Hazama are sheep and Kiyama's a wolf.
Desmond, 5 votes: Kokonoe, Accelerator, Toshiko, Kiyama, Klavier
Lambdadelta, 2 votes: Mayumi, Ankh
Kiyama, 4 votes: Rika, Parker, Lambdadelta, Hazama
no vote: Desmond
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 01:37 am (UTC)If Accelerator really is a wolf, though, I wonder why all three would put their vote on the same sheep. It's true that looking at the final stats it wouldn't have been possible for them to keep Kiyama from going up no matter what, but... This would be easier to figure out if there were a record of what order the overall votes came in, but I'm not seeing one in the ousting post--most people didn't make note of it.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 01:55 am (UTC)[shrugs] The obvious possible answer is that they figured piling up on someone who wasn't there was the best way to distract from Kiyama. And I doubt they'd want to risk him going up against you, since I doubt he'd've survived against anyone who could offer a decent defense. I wouldn't consider it firm evidence, but I'd definitely question Accelerator pretty hard on that tomorrow.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:35 am (UTC)... Looks like our most useful player is back.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: